Even the title of this section proves the editors at the Cleveland Plain Dealer just don't get it.
They say readers are "upset by the lists that aren't published." But as you can see from reading, it's not the lists they aren't publishing that has Plain Dealer readers seeing red. Rather, it's the hypocracy revealed in which lists the paper is so vehemently committed to publishing.
01/15/04
Readers upset by the lists that aren't published
I read with interest the recent editorial staunchly defending the newspaper's First Amendment right to publish the names of those exercising their Second Amendment rights by legally carrying concealed weapons in public, in full conformance with the recently passed Ohio law.
Tell me, is The Plain Dealer also going to publish the names of those illegally carrying concealed weapons in public?
Thomas J. Finn
Chagrin Falls
I've looked in the paper the last couple of days for the lists of sex offenders and drunken drivers. I haven't been able to find them. Why, then, do the powers that be think it's a good idea to list the names of the law-abiding citizens who get concealed-weapons permits?
How does not listing people who have broken the law but listing the ones who follow it make me or anyone else safer? What is The Plain Dealer's real reason for wanting to do this?
Mark Ratcliff
Parma
Click on the "Read More..." link below for more letters.
align="right">