AOC's accidental revelation: It's the criminal, not the firearm
University of Chicago Institute of Politics senior fellow and notable chief strategist for former President Barack Obama, David Axelrod, had the opportunity to speak with U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) recently. During their one-and-a-half-hour conversation, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez — a staunch proponent of strict gun control — made a great point about lawful gun ownership that she probably didn’t realize she was making.
Axelrod asked her about litmus tests from special interest groups on elected officials, and he referenced a conversation he had with U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) years prior about gun control. The senator told Axelrod he would not vote the same way on gun control that he does now if he instead represented his hometown of Brooklyn, New York, in Congress.
Register now! 2026 Patriot Fest - Aug. 22 in Hilliard, Ohio
Ocasio-Cortez, in a long statement answering the question, agreed. “It’s true, the way guns show up in rural Vermont is very different than in Brownsville, Brooklyn,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “You should vote differently in those communities.”
The remarks sparked immediate backlash in online discussions, as some commenters argued she was making racist remarks. However — as the firearms industry believes — the Second Amendment is for every law-abiding American, no matter your background, race or religion. And while the point of her remarks was about the calculus Members of Congress must consider when casting votes on public policy, the example she brought up about firearms and gun ownership are noteworthy.
As it turns out, Ocasio-Cortez — likely without realizing it — wasn’t making the point she thought she was making.
Quite the contrast
Ocasio-Cortez has spent the past seven years supporting all measure of federal gun control proposals to come through Washington, including a failed attempt to impose a federal ban on modern sporting rifles (MSRs), that would restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights. She has even criticized the lawful and highly regulated firearm industry, which provides Americans the ability and means of exercising their constitutional rights, suggesting the industry is “all about blood money.” There are too many examples to list, but to her point to Axelrod — those are the votes her district expected, even if the results of those gun control policies don’t result in truly safer communities.
In fact, while speaking in Chicago with Axelrod, Ocasio-Cortez’s comments seem to nuke all the gun control arguments she’s ever made. Her words make the point about the inefficacy of passing stricter and stricter gun control laws much better than any gun rights organization ever could.
Vermont, a state that receives a score of only 43 out of 100 from the billionaire Michael Bloomberg-funded gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety for how “strong” its gun control laws are, also has one of the highest per-capita rankings of gun ownership in the country. At 50.5 firearms owned per 100 people, Vermont ranks No. 15 out of 50 states in gun ownership per capita. The culture and history of firearm ownership in the Green Mountain State are centuries long and today are still robust — across all ages and even across political party lines. Vermonters hunt, target shoot, and keep firearms for self-defense. And yet homicides committed with firearms are uncommon there.
According to the Vermont Attorney General’s website, Vermont experienced 25 total homicide deaths in 2024, only 15 of which involved a firearm. In addition, like most everywhere else in the country, the majority of Vermont’s deaths involving a firearm were the result of suicide.
Meanwhile in New York
For its close neighbor — more appropriately farther south in Brooklyn — gun ownership and gun control laws couldn’t be any more opposite.
Unsurprisingly, Everytown ranks New York No. 4 in the country for “strength of gun laws,” though Gov. Kathy Hochul loves to brag the state is No. 1, rivaling California. The strict gun control-loving officials in Albany, as well as a string of governors going back 20 years, have restricted Second Amendment rights and gun ownership so much, it’s near the bottom of the barrel with regards to respect for gun ownership.
The same rankings that place Vermont at 15 put New York at 46, meaning for every 100 New Yorkers, only 19.2 of them own a firearm. How does that translate to public safety? According to New York City police data, there were 688 shooting incidents in New York City alone in 2025. Incredibly, that made it “the safest year on record,” according to police. That is in the state’s largest city, which also has stricter gun control laws than in counties and cities located in other regions of the state.
Why it matters
It’s the person holding the gun — not the gun. This article doesn’t mention race or ethnicity or religion at all because that’s the point. Firearms do not shoot on their own. A firearm’s trigger is pulled by someone.
When criminals — who are already comfortable breaking the law — are often allowed back out of jail time and time again, as they are in Manhattan and New York City, they will most likely commit crimes again and again. They will steal firearms. They will illegally sell them. They will illegally and dangerously use them.
The firearms are the same. Vermont has semi-automatic handguns, as does New York City. Vermont doesn’t restrict the sale of MSRs, the semi-automatic centerfire rifles that are the most commonly owned rifle in America. That’s not true of New York. But the metal and polymer is all the same, and in Vermont, these firearms are much more prevalent and common, according to the data.
Ocasio-Cortez made an excellent point in her answer in Chicago. It just wasn’t the point she intended to make. If she truly cared about safer communities and Brooklyn neighborhoods, maybe her voting record should be much different.
- 15 reads
