Latest round of motions filed in OFCC Inc. v City of Clyde

On Friday, attorneys for Ohioans For Concealed Carry, and (separately) for Attorney General Jim Petro, filed additional Motions in Ohioans For Concealed Carry, Inc. v City of Clyde. The Motions, which can be downloaded from links at the end of this story, mark another stage in written arguments, and put the case on a time-line for a ruling in mid-July.

The Fremont News Messenger is reporting on the developments with a simple headline: "Petro: Clyde is wrong".

From the story:

    Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro says Clyde's interpretation of state law on concealed weapons in parks is wrong.

    In a brief filed Friday in a court case, Petro argued that if Clyde is allowed to ban weapons in its parks, it could set a precedent that would render the state's concealed-carry laws useless.

    Petro's brief said Clyde was misinterpreting the law.

    "Concealed carry is meaningless if citizens cannot carry on public sidewalks and streets," it said.

    If Clyde's law is upheld, it said, "then the City of Clyde would also have the ability to prohibit concealed carry anywhere within its borders."

    That would defeat the whole purpose of the law, the brief said.

In its court-filed response to the OFCC lawsuit, the City of Clyde argued that its land should be treated the same as private property, whose owners have the right to restrict weapons. Thus, Clyde argues, the law isn't enforced the same way everywhere and the city should be able to restrict use.

Again, from the story:

    The last arguments will be heard in two weeks. Ken Hanson, attorney representing Ohioans for Concealed Carry, said he hoped a decision could come by mid-July.

    In a motion filed last month, Barry Bova, the attorney representing the city of Clyde, argued that as a local charter government the city has a legal right to create laws to protect its residents. He cited other cases in which local government ordinances were accepted by courts as exceptions to state law.

    Bova was in court Friday and could not be reached for comment.

    Petro's brief said that Clyde's arguments only focus on a small section of the state's concealed-carry law and that when taken as a whole, the concealed-carry laws are general laws that supercede any conflicting city ordinances.

    "If every municipality in Ohio were permitted to enforce its own unique concealed carry laws, licensed carriers will less likely be on notice of the restrictions, which will impair the State of Ohio's licensing scheme and create a threat of arrest for citizens duly licensed under the law," Petro argues in the brief.

    In his motion Friday, Hanson likened Bova's argument to a free speech case. While a private citizen can prevent someone from making a speech on private property, governments are not afforded the same right, he said. Therefore, he argued, while private citizens can prevent concealed-carry owners from entering their property, Clyde cannot.

    "There's nothing in the case that says that government property owners have to be treated the same as private property owners," he said. "Governments don't have rights. Citizens have rights."

Click here to download and read OFCC's Response to Clyde's Motion for Summary Judgement in .pdf format.

Click here to download and read Attorney General Jim Petro's Memo in Opposition to Clyde's Motion for Summary Judgement in .pdf format.

Click on the "Read More..." link below for information on how you can help fund this lawsuit.

If you are not a member of Ohioans for Concealed Carry, now is the time
to join!

Whether a new or continuing member, we need your financial support to fight this important lawsuit!

Ohioans For Concealed Carry plans to defend vigorously your right to
self-defense and legal carry concealed carry rights. We need your continued support to do so.

Please forward this alert by any means to fellow concealed carry advocates across the state.

Credit Card or PayPal donations can be accepted through our Secure Web Store immediately, which can be found at

Just look for the donation link and enter the contribution value of your choice. We ask you to dig deep and consider a significant donation to help offset the costs of legal representation.

You don't depend on others to defend your life, don't depend on others to defend your rights. Donate today.


Ohioans For Concealed Carry

You can mail checks and money orders to us through our post office box in Cleveland, Ohio:

P.O Box 25488
Cleveland, OH 44125-0488

Related Stories:
Attorney General Jim Petro Defends Concealed Carry Law

Suit seeks the beginning of the end for local gun ordinances

Help us fight for your rights!

Become a member of Buckeye Firearms Association and support our grassroots efforts to defend and advance YOUR RIGHTS!

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

Get weekly news and instant alerts on the latest laws and politics that affect your gun rights. Enjoy cutting-edge commentary. Be among the first to hear about gun raffles, firearms training, and special events. Read more.

We respect your privacy and your email address will be kept confidential.


Buckeye Firearms Association is a grassroots organization dedicated to defending and advancing the right of citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities, including self-defense, hunting, competition, and recreation. Read more.