Op-Ed: Rudy Giuliani's Narrow Reading of the Second Amendment

By Jacob Sullum

Despite his promise to appoint "strict constructionists" to the Supreme Court if he is elected president, Rudy Giuliani recently said he has no interest in overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that discovered a previously unnoticed constitutional right to abortion. Offending social conservatives (and strict constructionists) even further, he told CNN this constitutional right may require government financing of abortions for women who otherwise cannot afford them.

Since Giuliani also claims to support "the right to bear arms" (a right that is actually mentioned in the Constitution), he should, by similar logic, advocate the use of taxpayer money to buy guns for poor people. But the idea would never occur to him, because his sudden interest in the Second Amendment, like his sudden interest in strict constructionism, is merely an affectation intended to allay the concerns of Republican primary voters.

In his stump speeches, Giuliani, whose campaign Web site calls him "a strong supporter of the Second Amendment," praises the federal appeals court decision that last month overturned the District of Columbia's ban on keeping guns in the home for self-defense. Yet that ban is only slightly stricter than the gun laws that Giuliani still brags about vigorously enforcing when he was mayor of New York.

Giuliani tries to reconcile his support for strict gun control in New York with his newfound commitment to the Second Amendment by saying that different jurisdictions should be able to choose the gun laws that are appropriate for them. As his Web site puts it, "Rudy understands that what works in New York doesn't necessarily work in Mississippi or Montana."

But the right to keep and bear arms has no meaning if politicians are free to impose any kind of gun control they think "works."

Click here to read the entire op-ed at Townhall.com.

Click 'Read More' for details on Giuliani's 1990's talks with President Bill Clinton on establishing uniform national gun control laws.

Related Stories:
Giuliani Faces Skeptical GOP Voters

    "I'm older than most here, so I remember certain things," Peter Bearse, 65, a Freemont, N.H., Republican said, recalling that the ex-mayor had advised Clinton on the [gun control] issues. Giuliani vehemently disputed that characterization: "The fact is, I never advised President Clinton. I wasn't an adviser to President Clinton." However, Giuliani and Clinton did talk in the 1990s about establishing uniform national gun control laws.

Op-Ed: Rudy Bumpo - Should Giuliani go hunting? How about asking the hunters?

Rudy Giuliani: Gun manufacturers knowingly calculate sales to illegal market

Op-Ed: Law and Order and Guns - Rudy has some funny views on guns

Op-Ed: Rudy's Gun-Control Agenda

2008: Gun Control Candidates Need Not Apply

Firearms Industry Warns:
Giuliani No Friend to Gun Owners

Guns are back on the table

Hannity ask Giuliani the right questions on guns

Dave Kopel's Presidential candidates on the Second Amendment

Early 2008 Presidential Contenders: Pick your gun control poison

Misguided mayors need to look to Castle Doctrine laws to curb crime

Help us fight for your rights!

Become a member of Buckeye Firearms Association and support our grassroots efforts to defend and advance YOUR RIGHTS!

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

Get weekly news and instant alerts on the latest laws and politics that affect your gun rights. Enjoy cutting-edge commentary. Be among the first to hear about gun raffles, firearms training, and special events. Read more.

We respect your privacy and your email address will be kept confidential.


Buckeye Firearms Association is a grassroots organization dedicated to defending and advancing the right of citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities, including self-defense, hunting, competition, and recreation. Read more.